My request is 3-fold but has to do with the same set of data. I understand the purpose of having "Device Types" and associating that data with a number for importing to go smoothly. However, there are a few things that I'd like to see changed for ease of use and reporting.

1. Add the associated Device Type Number to the columns in the device type settings. Currently this can only be found in the import menu and that only shows 5 at a time, but with information missing. For instance, I have two of the same exact device types with the Supplier being the only difference - one is from Sehi and the other Trafera. Fortunately, I new which order I added them in so I was able to figure it out, but there isn't currently a way to tell which is which because when you click "Field Values" in the import devices section, it only shows Brand and Model as a combined value. Adding the number to the Device Type menu in settings and showing all data points in the "Field Values" menu would be very helpful when importing a lot of different devices.

2. Can the Device Type fields be broken out into displayable, separate fields in the device list? Currently, the View Devices menu combines Brand and Model together, which isn't usually a huge deal unless I want to see all Apple Devices, not just specific model numbers. And it would be nice to have the Supplier in there as an option as well so I can see differences of where devices came from as we commonly have to order from different suppliers due to supply chain issues.

3. The last part of this is in the reporting. Currently, I only see one column holding the Device type data and it is a merged cell that shows Brand and Model together. Being able to export each data point is very valuable so if I need to export and just pull all Chromebooks in the data, I can do that. Or pull all orders from one Supplier. And merging Brand and Model together seems to muddy the data more in the exports because I have to ensure I space it correctly if I need to parse it out to see Brand separate from the Model.

Thank you for considering this feature request!